![]() |
|
August 1 , 2006 Dear Colleague, De Gaulle was a great admirer of Israel. As president of the Fifth Republic, he sent military hardware--Mirage IIIs, tanks, helicopters, and patrol boats--to Israel. He did so, no doubt, for geopolitical reasons, but also because of his admiration for Ben Gurion, the Israeli prime minister. Of him, De Gaulle wrote: "David Ben Gurion came to see me more than once. I had developed an immediate liking and respect for this doughty warrior and champion. He was the personification of Israel, which he now ruled, having presided over her foundation and her war of independence. I could not fail to be attracted by the grandur of an enterprise which consisted in re-establishing an autonomous Jewis nation in a land that bore the traces of its fabulous history." Now, that's starry-eyed admiration, isn't it? Can it be more whole-heartedly expressed? Nevertheless, De Gaulle added:
American politicians over the entire political spectrum say that the root problem of violence in the Middle East lies in the existence of Hamas in Palestine and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Surely, the root goes deeper than that? De Gaulle's prognostication of troubles to come seems to me far more deeply rooted. Support for Israel is America is total, no matter what Israel does. Hilary Clinton is reported to have said that, for her, the two captured Israeli soldiers might as well be American soldiers, so deeply does she identify with them. There are times when I wonder whether the USA is an independent country, with a foreign policy of her own. In America, I have heard thus far only one small, lone voice raised in protest against the overwhelming use of force in Lebanon, and it comes from the Jewish Committee for Peace and Justice in Milwaukee. So there you are! That which gives Israel--the idea and ideal of Israel--its unsurpassed moral grandeur is not totally dead. Best wishes, Yi-Fu
|
Terms of Use, How to Cite. Subscribe |